Over at The New York Times, blogger Robert Mackey wonders if, perhaps, the controversy over General McChrystal's remarks and dismissal signal a "culture war" between the all-volunteer military and the rare-to-volunteer civilian leadership.
@wally: I don't favor conscription, myself. I follow Robert Heinlein on this, who viewed it as involuntary servitude and thus forbidden under the 13th Amendment. If a man or woman can't be persuaded to join voluntarily, his reasoning goes, then maybe your country deserves to fail.
As I've mentioned in the past, I'd like to see a quid pro quo system of exchange of voluntary service for government benefits such as Social Security or medical coverage. No service, no benefits. It's a step up from conscription in that the citizen still enjoys free will and can refuse service. For the working classes the benefits would be a powerful incentive, however.
@wally: realistically you won't get the wealthy to join the military or any other government agency, they have no financial incentive to do so. Besides, don't the rich exist to fund all of these government programs I'm proposing with confiscatory taxes? Isn't their patriotic duty, then, fulfilled by taking that money away from them?
By the way, when I served back in the late '60's and the draft was in effect, there were plenty of well-off draftees around. I didn't run into any fabulously wealthy people, but I wonder how rich Dick Cheney was at the time. At any rate, I suppose if I were to reinstitute the draft, I'd tighten up the deferments too. As for the monetary contribution of the rich, it's exactly my point that maybe they'd be less eager to foot the bill for foolish wars if they had had some first-hand experience of their cost. But maybe not.
A newsroom comprised entirely of leftists/liberals is no more capable of ideological objectivity than an all-white newsroom would be of racial objectivity, or an all-male newsroom of gender objectivity.
Captain Louis Renault
"Round Up the Usual Suspects."
The Drawn Cutlass Philosophy
Be as decent as you can. Don't believe without evidence. Treat things divine with marked respect, and don't have anything to do with them. Do not trust humanity without collateral security, it will play you some scurvy trick. Remember that it hurts no one to be treated as an enemy entitled to respect until he prove himself a friend worthy of affection. Cultivate a taste for distasteful truths. And, finally, most important of all, endeavor to see things as they are, not as they ought to be.
Ambrose Bierce
The Foe
When I am free to walk the streets of Mecca or Medina as the agnostic I am and receive nothing but curious glances, I will believe Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance.
Sign On. You Know You Want To.
A Few Words From Some Founding Fathers
All Men Are Created Equal. (Thomas Jefferson, Founding Father)
But Differ Greatly In the Sequel. (Fisher Ames, Founding Father)
Jeff Cooper's Rules of Gun Safety
All guns are always loaded. Even if they are not, treat them as if they are.
Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy. (For those who insist that this particular gun is unloaded, see Rule 1.)
Keep your finger off the trigger till your sights are on the target. This is the Golden Rule. Its violation is directly responsible for about 60 percent of inadvertent discharges.
Identify your target, and what is behind it. Never shoot at anything that you have not positively identified.
Bob's Addendum To Cooper's Rules
A Gun is not a Toy. Don't Play With It.
Bob's Theory of Hush Puppies
Bob's Theory of Hush Puppies: The best hush puppies are oblong shaped, rather like dog turds. The worst ones are spherical, like balls. The spherical ones are usually made from the recipe on a pre-packaged box of hush puppy mix.
Restaurant Ratings
My restaurant ratings, mostly intended for BBQ restaurants, will be on a 1-5 scale, with 1 being the worst and 5 being the best. Unlike most reviewers, I don't intend to play games with the rating scale by introducing fractions such as "2 and 1/2" or "4 and 3/4," I've always considered that stupid and a signal that the reviewer is trying to avoid making an honest 1-5 judgment.
Here is the breakdown of the ratings:
1 out of 5: waste of time, crap, unable to finish eating; apathy by staff/ownership
2 out of 5: edible, but no effort to impress; staff/management going through motions; desultory.
3 out of 5: average; reasonably good food, moderate effort by staff/management
4 out of 5: good; tasty, well-prepared food, staff alert, restaurant clean.
5 out of 5: great; excellent food, cooked fresh. Staff attentive and proactive, management responsive to complaints. Restaurant spotless.
On Self-Reliance
"A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects."
6 comments:
I think the draft should be reinstituted.
@wally: I don't favor conscription, myself. I follow Robert Heinlein on this, who viewed it as involuntary servitude and thus forbidden under the 13th Amendment. If a man or woman can't be persuaded to join voluntarily, his reasoning goes, then maybe your country deserves to fail.
As I've mentioned in the past, I'd like to see a quid pro quo system of exchange of voluntary service for government benefits such as Social Security or medical coverage. No service, no benefits. It's a step up from conscription in that the citizen still enjoys free will and can refuse service. For the working classes the benefits would be a powerful incentive, however.
Which is a problem in itself. It's the other classes who need to be exposed to the experience. You know, the Dick Cheneys and Bill Clintons.
@wally: realistically you won't get the wealthy to join the military or any other government agency, they have no financial incentive to do so. Besides, don't the rich exist to fund all of these government programs I'm proposing with confiscatory taxes? Isn't their patriotic duty, then, fulfilled by taking that money away from them?
There you go, changing the subject again ;)
By the way, when I served back in the late '60's and the draft was in effect, there were plenty of well-off draftees around. I didn't run into any fabulously wealthy people, but I wonder how rich Dick Cheney was at the time. At any rate, I suppose if I were to reinstitute the draft, I'd tighten up the deferments too. As for the monetary contribution of the rich, it's exactly my point that maybe they'd be less eager to foot the bill for foolish wars if they had had some first-hand experience of their cost. But maybe not.
Post a Comment