It's a shame you're not nearly as interested in the hundreds of examples of the same kind of silliness going on right here in the USA. I suppose it's because the culprits are the insurance companies and personal injury attorneys, and not the mean old gummint.
@wally: That's right, Walt. I won't be anywhere near as interested until those insurance companies and lawyers have the power to stick a gun in my face and throw me in jail for failing to comply with their regulations. There's a fundamental difference there that I think eludes you.
Which of the people in your Years of Madness box had a gun stuck in their face and were thrown in jail?
And of course one reason to become mildly interested in such goings-on here is that this is your country, and you have the ability to affect what happens here, whereas you can only function as a smirking bystander to UK follies.
@wally: it's not a matter of were they thrown in jail or a gun stuck in their face, but can they. Yes, a government can do both, especially when they've been careful to disarm the populace out of concern for that very same "'elf and safety."
re: "smirking bystander." *shrugs* whatever. You're just being a dick now.
So "smirking" is an unfair characterization of the tone of your frequent posts about the excesses of the British government? And "bystander" doesn't reflect your inability (as a US citizen) to have an effect on those excesses? If so, I'll withdraw the label. As to my being a "dick", I'll accept that as long as you preface it with "big swinging".
@wally: I think that Sailorcurt in an earlier thread got it right, you try to change the subject. Insulting me serves no purpose other than entertainment on your part, and does nothing to address the substance of the story, which is that stupid, over-the-top regulations put in place by a leftist government will soon face review and probable change by the new government.
Bob, I stated my opinion in my very first comment, and have stuck to that theme ever since. If you felt that was changing the subject, you probably should have said so right then, and saved us both some time.
@wally: actually, you changed the subject to similar regulations here in the US, which was not the point of the story. The point of the story was that those regulations, which have the force of law in the UK, are under review by the new government, which was elected partly on a promise to change such nanny state stupidity. Later you seemed to wander off to whether I should be blogging or actively working to change such regulations.
A newsroom comprised entirely of leftists/liberals is no more capable of ideological objectivity than an all-white newsroom would be of racial objectivity, or an all-male newsroom of gender objectivity.
Captain Louis Renault
"Round Up the Usual Suspects."
The Drawn Cutlass Philosophy
Be as decent as you can. Don't believe without evidence. Treat things divine with marked respect, and don't have anything to do with them. Do not trust humanity without collateral security, it will play you some scurvy trick. Remember that it hurts no one to be treated as an enemy entitled to respect until he prove himself a friend worthy of affection. Cultivate a taste for distasteful truths. And, finally, most important of all, endeavor to see things as they are, not as they ought to be.
Ambrose Bierce
The Foe
When I am free to walk the streets of Mecca or Medina as the agnostic I am and receive nothing but curious glances, I will believe Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance.
Sign On. You Know You Want To.
A Few Words From Some Founding Fathers
All Men Are Created Equal. (Thomas Jefferson, Founding Father)
But Differ Greatly In the Sequel. (Fisher Ames, Founding Father)
Jeff Cooper's Rules of Gun Safety
All guns are always loaded. Even if they are not, treat them as if they are.
Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy. (For those who insist that this particular gun is unloaded, see Rule 1.)
Keep your finger off the trigger till your sights are on the target. This is the Golden Rule. Its violation is directly responsible for about 60 percent of inadvertent discharges.
Identify your target, and what is behind it. Never shoot at anything that you have not positively identified.
Bob's Addendum To Cooper's Rules
A Gun is not a Toy. Don't Play With It.
Bob's Theory of Hush Puppies
Bob's Theory of Hush Puppies: The best hush puppies are oblong shaped, rather like dog turds. The worst ones are spherical, like balls. The spherical ones are usually made from the recipe on a pre-packaged box of hush puppy mix.
Restaurant Ratings
My restaurant ratings, mostly intended for BBQ restaurants, will be on a 1-5 scale, with 1 being the worst and 5 being the best. Unlike most reviewers, I don't intend to play games with the rating scale by introducing fractions such as "2 and 1/2" or "4 and 3/4," I've always considered that stupid and a signal that the reviewer is trying to avoid making an honest 1-5 judgment.
Here is the breakdown of the ratings:
1 out of 5: waste of time, crap, unable to finish eating; apathy by staff/ownership
2 out of 5: edible, but no effort to impress; staff/management going through motions; desultory.
3 out of 5: average; reasonably good food, moderate effort by staff/management
4 out of 5: good; tasty, well-prepared food, staff alert, restaurant clean.
5 out of 5: great; excellent food, cooked fresh. Staff attentive and proactive, management responsive to complaints. Restaurant spotless.
On Self-Reliance
"A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects."
8 comments:
It's a shame you're not nearly as interested in the hundreds of examples of the same kind of silliness going on right here in the USA. I suppose it's because the culprits are the insurance companies and personal injury attorneys, and not the mean old gummint.
@wally: That's right, Walt. I won't be anywhere near as interested until those insurance companies and lawyers have the power to stick a gun in my face and throw me in jail for failing to comply with their regulations. There's a fundamental difference there that I think eludes you.
Which of the people in your Years of Madness box had a gun stuck in their face and were thrown in jail?
And of course one reason to become mildly interested in such goings-on here is that this is your country, and you have the ability to affect what happens here, whereas you can only function as a smirking bystander to UK follies.
@wally: it's not a matter of were they thrown in jail or a gun stuck in their face, but can they. Yes, a government can do both, especially when they've been careful to disarm the populace out of concern for that very same "'elf and safety."
re: "smirking bystander." *shrugs* whatever. You're just being a dick now.
So "smirking" is an unfair characterization of the tone of your frequent posts about the excesses of the British government? And "bystander" doesn't reflect your inability (as a US citizen) to have an effect on those excesses? If so, I'll withdraw the label. As to my being a "dick", I'll accept that as long as you preface it with "big swinging".
@wally: I think that Sailorcurt in an earlier thread got it right, you try to change the subject. Insulting me serves no purpose other than entertainment on your part, and does nothing to address the substance of the story, which is that stupid, over-the-top regulations put in place by a leftist government will soon face review and probable change by the new government.
Bob, I stated my opinion in my very first comment, and have stuck to that theme ever since. If you felt that was changing the subject, you probably should have said so right then, and saved us both some time.
@wally: actually, you changed the subject to similar regulations here in the US, which was not the point of the story. The point of the story was that those regulations, which have the force of law in the UK, are under review by the new government, which was elected partly on a promise to change such nanny state stupidity. Later you seemed to wander off to whether I should be blogging or actively working to change such regulations.
Post a Comment