Sometimes the material does indeed write itself, but not this time. Not when a British tabloid is on the job, and not when our Bob is there to mindlessly parrot whatever a British tabloid says. Be honest now, Bob: does the headline fairly represent what the article says? Look at the first sentence of the article. Does the headline do that sentence justice? Man. Has critical thinking and reading with care just gone down the toilet? I'm not just getting exercised over trivialities. The creative process is important to me, in my line of work. It involves the floating of ideas which may sound harebrained, most of which will be discarded, but some of which actually turn out to solve the problem. And the creative process works only when people feel free to float such out-of-the-box ideas, without legions of Scopesian know-nothings sitting on their front porches and hee-hawing at them. Sorry to see you plopping yourself down on the porch with them.
@wally: And the creative process works only when people feel free to float such out-of-the-box ideas, without legions of Scopesian know-nothings sitting on their front porches and hee-hawing at them. Sorry to see you plopping yourself down on the porch with them.
Well, shut up you mouth-breathing peckerwoods is hardly the right argument to use if you want to convince them, Wally.
Oh, I long ago dismissed any hope of convincing you of anything, Bob. It just feels good to vent. And y'all participate in perpetuating the peckerwood stereotype every time you take a cheap shot at pointy-headed intellectuals by cherry-picking ideas that sound ridiculous to you. I'm content to let my points about the creative process and casual distortions of Brit-rag headline writers stand unrebutted.
A newsroom comprised entirely of leftists/liberals is no more capable of ideological objectivity than an all-white newsroom would be of racial objectivity, or an all-male newsroom of gender objectivity.
Captain Louis Renault
"Round Up the Usual Suspects."
The Drawn Cutlass Philosophy
Be as decent as you can. Don't believe without evidence. Treat things divine with marked respect, and don't have anything to do with them. Do not trust humanity without collateral security, it will play you some scurvy trick. Remember that it hurts no one to be treated as an enemy entitled to respect until he prove himself a friend worthy of affection. Cultivate a taste for distasteful truths. And, finally, most important of all, endeavor to see things as they are, not as they ought to be.
Ambrose Bierce
The Foe
When I am free to walk the streets of Mecca or Medina as the agnostic I am and receive nothing but curious glances, I will believe Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance.
Sign On. You Know You Want To.
A Few Words From Some Founding Fathers
All Men Are Created Equal. (Thomas Jefferson, Founding Father)
But Differ Greatly In the Sequel. (Fisher Ames, Founding Father)
Jeff Cooper's Rules of Gun Safety
All guns are always loaded. Even if they are not, treat them as if they are.
Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy. (For those who insist that this particular gun is unloaded, see Rule 1.)
Keep your finger off the trigger till your sights are on the target. This is the Golden Rule. Its violation is directly responsible for about 60 percent of inadvertent discharges.
Identify your target, and what is behind it. Never shoot at anything that you have not positively identified.
Bob's Addendum To Cooper's Rules
A Gun is not a Toy. Don't Play With It.
Bob's Theory of Hush Puppies
Bob's Theory of Hush Puppies: The best hush puppies are oblong shaped, rather like dog turds. The worst ones are spherical, like balls. The spherical ones are usually made from the recipe on a pre-packaged box of hush puppy mix.
Restaurant Ratings
My restaurant ratings, mostly intended for BBQ restaurants, will be on a 1-5 scale, with 1 being the worst and 5 being the best. Unlike most reviewers, I don't intend to play games with the rating scale by introducing fractions such as "2 and 1/2" or "4 and 3/4," I've always considered that stupid and a signal that the reviewer is trying to avoid making an honest 1-5 judgment.
Here is the breakdown of the ratings:
1 out of 5: waste of time, crap, unable to finish eating; apathy by staff/ownership
2 out of 5: edible, but no effort to impress; staff/management going through motions; desultory.
3 out of 5: average; reasonably good food, moderate effort by staff/management
4 out of 5: good; tasty, well-prepared food, staff alert, restaurant clean.
5 out of 5: great; excellent food, cooked fresh. Staff attentive and proactive, management responsive to complaints. Restaurant spotless.
On Self-Reliance
"A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects."
3 comments:
Sometimes the material does indeed write itself, but not this time. Not when a British tabloid is on the job, and not when our Bob is there to mindlessly parrot whatever a British tabloid says. Be honest now, Bob: does the headline fairly represent what the article says? Look at the first sentence of the article. Does the headline do that sentence justice? Man. Has critical thinking and reading with care just gone down the toilet? I'm not just getting exercised over trivialities. The creative process is important to me, in my line of work. It involves the floating of ideas which may sound harebrained, most of which will be discarded, but some of which actually turn out to solve the problem. And the creative process works only when people feel free to float such out-of-the-box ideas, without legions of Scopesian know-nothings sitting on their front porches and hee-hawing at them. Sorry to see you plopping yourself down on the porch with them.
@wally: And the creative process works only when people feel free to float such out-of-the-box ideas, without legions of Scopesian know-nothings sitting on their front porches and hee-hawing at them. Sorry to see you plopping yourself down on the porch with them.
Well, shut up you mouth-breathing peckerwoods is hardly the right argument to use if you want to convince them, Wally.
Oh, I long ago dismissed any hope of convincing you of anything, Bob. It just feels good to vent. And y'all participate in perpetuating the peckerwood stereotype every time you take a cheap shot at pointy-headed intellectuals by cherry-picking ideas that sound ridiculous to you. I'm content to let my points about the creative process and casual distortions of Brit-rag headline writers stand unrebutted.
Post a Comment